Group B-6 ‰»Šw\‘’@(Chemical Structure)  
œ Biusiton
@@@
@ Laboratory@ @
CA CHL/IU Max ( 3.0 mg/ml, -S9), 24-48h
 
1)
1) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal@Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)

œ Black tee flavor ig’ƒ—Ώj
@@@
@ Food@
CA CHL/IU Min ( 2.5 mg/ml, -S9), 24h; D20= 3.8 TR =3.6
›
1)
1) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)

œ Bleomycin-HCl @(ƒuƒŒƒIƒ}ƒCƒVƒ“E‰–Ž_‰–j
@@@
67763-87-5 @Medicine@@
AM Sal. Max ( 9.4 ƒΚg/ml, -S9)   1)
AM E. coli Min ( 10.0 ƒΚg/ml, -S9) › 2)
MB Fungi Min ( 0.1 ƒΚg/ml, -S9) › 3)
YM Yeast Max ( 100 ƒΚg/ml, -S9)   4)
CA Vicia faba Min ( 5ƒΚg/ml, -S9) › 5)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.2 ƒΚg/ml, -S9),24h; D20= 0.00014; TR= 60000.  6)
CA Hum. Ly Min ( 1 ƒΚg/ml, -S9) › 7)
SM CHO Min ( 4 ƒΚg/ml, -S9) › 8)
SCE CH Max ( 200 ƒΚg/ml, -S9)   9)
UDS Hum. Ly Min ( 20 ƒΚg/ml, -S9) › 10)
MNv Mice Max ( 40 mg/kg)   11)
MNv Mice Min ( 20 mg/kg) › 12)
1) Seino et al., 1978 (?)
2) Dzhataev et al., 1980 (?)
3) Demopoulos et al., 1982 (?)
4) Hannnan & Nasim, 1978 (?)
5) Andersson, 1981 (?)
6) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal@Aberration Test iIn Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)
7) Cohen & Simpson, 1983 (?)
8) Cunningham et al., 1984 (?)
9) Nishi et al, 1984 (?)
10) Berger et al., 1979 (?)
11) Maier & Schmid, 1976 (?)
12) Van Buul & Goudzwaard, 1980 (?)

yNotez
(Cited from IARC Monographs, Suppl., 6, 1987).
@Bleomycins induced CAs in lymphocytes of treated patients in one study.
In mice treated in vivo, it induced CAs (including heritable translocations) and SCEs but gave conflicting results in tests for MNs. It induced CAs and DNA strand breaks in human cells in vitro but gave conflicting results in tests for UDS and SCEs.
@It induced tranformation of mouse C3HT101/2 cells, and induced aneuploidy, CAs, mutation and DNA damage in rodent cells in vitro; a weakly positive response was observed for the induction of SCEs. In Drosophila, it induced aneuploidy, CAs SLRL mutations, somatic mutations, genetic crossing-over and recombination, but not heritable translocations. it induced CAs but not SCEs in plants. It was mutagenic to fungi and induced gene conversion , recombination and genetic crossing-over. It was mutagenic and caused DNA damage in bacteria. (IARC Monographs, 26, 97,@1981):
         œ Blood plasma powder (ŒŒŸχ•²––j
@@
@        @Food/Natural@@
AM Sal / E. coli Max (?)
 
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 2.0 mg/ml, -S9), 24-48h
 
2)
1) Ishidate MJr, et al: Natl Inst. of Hygien. Sci., Tokyo (?)
2) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)

œ Bracken fern@iƒƒ‰ƒrj
      @Food/Natural@
yNotez (Cited from IARC Monographs, Suppl. 6, 1987)
@No data were available on the genetic and related effects of backen fern in humans.
@An acetone extract of bracken fern was mutagenic to Salmonella in the presence of an exogenous metabolic system. Light-petroleum and methanol extracts of bracken fern activated by alkaline treatment wee also mutagenic to Salmonella.@( IARC Monograph, 40, 47 ,1986; IARC Monographs, Suppl. 4, 138, 1982):

œ 1-Bromoacetic acid iƒuƒƒ‚|Ž_j
@@
79-08-3 @Industry @138.95@
AM Sal/E. coli Min ( 0.313 mg/plate, -S9); Spe= 812 (TA100)
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.004 mg/ml, +S9), 6h; D20= 0.0073

1)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) (1996) (Tables in English)

œ 1-Bromobutane (Butylbromide)

   
109-65-9 @Industry  MW: 137.02
AM Sal/E. coli Min ( 0.05% plate, }S9); Spa= 0.5% (TA11535)
›
1)
1) Japan Bioassay Research Center, Ann. Rep., (2005); Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.), Suppl. 4,    p.153 (2008),  (Tables in English)
œ 1-Bromoacetyl bromide
@@
598-21-0 @Industry @201.58@
AM Sal/E. coli Min ( 0.0781 mg/plate, -S9); spa= 8980 (TA104)

1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.006 mg/ml, -S9), 24h; D20= 0.0061

1)
1) Ministry of Labor, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) Suppl. (1997) (Tables in English)

œ 1-Bromo-2-chloroethane i1-ƒuƒƒ‚-2-ƒNƒƒƒGƒ^ƒ“j@(Ethylene chlorobromide)
@@
107-04-0 @Industry @ 143.41
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.3 mg/ml, +S9), 6h; D20=0.22
›
1)
1) Ministry of Labor, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.),(1996)

œ Bromochloromethane iƒuƒƒ‚ƒNƒƒƒƒ^ƒ“j@(Mthylene bromochloride, Halon 1011)
@@
74-97-5 @Industry @ 129.4
CA CHL/IU Min ( 5.0 mg/ml, -S9), 24h; D20=5.7
›w
1)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) Supp. (1997) (Tables in English)

œ 1-Bromo-3-chloropropane i1-ƒuƒƒ‚-3-ƒNƒƒƒvƒƒpƒ“j (Trimethylene chlorobromide)
@@
109-70-6 @Industry @ 157.44@
AM Sal /E. coli Min ( 0.588 mg/plate, }S9)
›
1)
AM Sal /E. coli Min ( 0.2 mg/plate, +S9); spa=100 › 2)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.25 mg/ml, +S9), 6-18h › 1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.25 mg/ml, +S9), 6h; D20=0.29
›
2)
1) Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare, Japan (Ed):Toxicity Testing Reports of Environ. Chemicals, Vol. 8(1) (2001) (Tables in English)
2) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) (1996) (Tables in English)

œ Bromodichloromethane
iƒuƒƒ‚ƒWƒNƒƒƒƒ^ƒ“j

@@@
75-27-4@Laboratory@ 163.83
AM Sal/E.coli Min (?)
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.24mg/ml, +S9), 3-18h; D20=0.25; TR=33
›
2)
MNv Mice Max (?)
 
3)
1) Natl. Inst. Hygien Sci., Tokyo (?)
2) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)
3)
?

œBromoethane (ƒuƒƒ‚ƒGƒ^ƒ“j
@@@74-96-4@Industry@ 109.0

yNotez
@(Cited from CICADS Document,  6 1999)

Studies in vitro
  Bromoethane has been studied in a variety of mutagenicity tests employing various strains of Salmonella typhimurium, for which a dose-response and at least a doubling of scores formed the basis of a positive response. In two well conducted closed system assays, positive responses were recorded in strains TA1535 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation (Barber et al., 1981; Roycroft, 1989). A negative result was obtained with TA98 in both studies. Simmon (1981), using only TA100 in a closed system assay, also reported a positive response with bromoethane.
   Plate incorporation and preincubation studies produce results that are fairly consistent with those obtained from closed system assays. One plate incorporation study of bromoethane produced positive results with strains TA98, TA100, and TA104 in the presence of Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 and with strain TA97 both with and without metabolic activation (Strobel & Grummt, 1987).
   An abstract reports positive results for TA100 and TA102 in a preincubation (60 min) study (Simmons et al., 1986). A second abstract also records a positive response in these two strains following a 10-min preincubation (Hughes et al., 1987). Haworth et al. (1983) obtained negative results following a 20-min preincubation of bromoethane with strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537. The preincubation method they describe suggests that open vessels were used. This would allow bromoethane to escape and so reduce the actual exposure concentration, resulting in possibly false-negative results.
   The above data indicate that bromoethane is directly mutagenic to Salmonella strains.
   Only one in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity study of bromoethane was available (Loveday et al., 1989). In this study, Chinese hamster ovary cells were used to study the clastogenicity and sister chromatid exchange (SCE)-inducing potential of bromoethane at concentrations of up to 1 mg/ml, the limit of solubility in dimethyl sulfoxide in this test system. No evidence of cell death was seen at this concentration.
   In the clastogenicity experiment, cells were exposed to bromoethane in the absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system for 8 h and harvested 2 h later. It is possible that the exposure times did not cover a complete cell cycle. In the presence of rat liver S9, cells were exposed for 2 h and harvested 10 h later. At concentrations of up to 1 mg/ml, bromoethane did not induce any increase in the incidence of chromosome aberrations in the cells under either of these test conditions.
   SCE-inducing potential was investigated by treating cells for 26 h in the absence of, or for 2 h in the presence of, Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9. Cells treated with S9 were then incubated for a further 24 h so that both sets of cells were sampled 26 h after the experiment began. Dose-dependent increases were seen in both the number of SCEs per chromosome and the number of SCEs per cell in the absence or presence of S9. In the absence of metabolic activation, 1.75- to 3.7-fold increases in the number of SCEs per cell were seen when compared with solvent controls, whereas the increases seen with metabolic activation were not sufficiently large to be considered positive.
   Negative results were reported in a sex-linked recessive lethal test on Drosophila using Berlin K males for solutions containing bromoethane at concentrations up to 8.2 mmol/litre (0.9 mg/ml) (Vogel & Chandler 1974).

Studies in vivo
  No in vivo genotocxicity data in either animals or human were vailable.

References
EBarber E, Donish W, Mueller K (1981) Procedures for the quantitative measurement of the mutagenicity of volatile liquids in the Ames Salmonella/microsome assay. Mutation Research, 90: 31-48.
ESimmon V (1981) Applications of the Salmonella/microsome assay. In: Stich HF, San RHC, eds. Short term tests for chemical carcinogens. New York, NY, Springer, pp. 120?126 (ISBN 0-387-90496-4).
EStrobel K, Grummt T (1987) Aliphatic and aromatic halocarbons as potential mutagens in drinking water. 3. Halogenated ethanes and ethenes. Toxicology and Environmental Chemistry, 15: 101-128.
EHughes T, Simmons D, Monteith L, Myer L, Claxton T (1987) Mutagenicity of 31 organic compounds in a modified preincubation Ames assay with Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 100 and TA 102. Environmental Mutagenesis, 9(Suppl. 8): 49.
EHaworth S, Lawlar T, Mortelmans K, Speck W, Zeiger E (1983) Salmonella mutagenicity test results for 250 chemicals. Environmental Mutagenesis, 5(Suppl. 1) :3-142.
ELoveday K, Lugo M, Resnick M, Anderson B, Zeiger E (1989) Chromosome aberration and sister chromatid exchange tests in Chinese harnster ovary cells in vivo. 2. Results with 20 chemicals. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 13: 60-94.

EVogel E, Chandler J (1974) Mutagenicity testing of cyclanate and some pesticides in Drosophila melanogaster. Experientia, 30: 612-623.

œ Bromoform @(ƒuƒƒ‚ƒtƒHƒ‹ƒ€j
@(Tribromomethane)
@@
75-25-2@@Industrial /solvent@@ 252.8
AM Sal/E.coli Min (?)
›
1)
AM Sal. Max (?), }S9   2)
REC B. subtilis Min (?), +S9 › 6)
MLY L5178Y Min (?), }S9 › 3)
CA CHO Min (?), -S9 › 4)
CA CHL/IU Min (?), }S9 › 5)
SCE CHO Min (?), +S9 › 6)
SLRLv Drosophila Min( 3000 ppm for  3d) › 7)
SCEv Mouse/BM Min ( 25 mg/kg/d x 4), po
›
8)
SCEv Mouse/BM Max ( 800 mg/kg, ip, 24h)   9)
MNv Mouse/BM Min ( 1.4 g/kg, ip, 24h) › 10)
UDSv Rats,  liver Max ( 1.08 g/kg, or, 24h)   11)
1) Torkelson TR., et al.: In: Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 3rd Rev. ed., Vol. 2B, Toxicol., pp. 3469-3470, J. Wiley & Sons,
   Nw York (1981)
2) Zeiger E et al., Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 16 (Suppl. 18), 32-54 (1990)
3) Myhr B. et al., Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 16 (Suppl. 18), 138-164 (1990)
4) Anderson .et al., Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 16 (Suppl. 18), 55-137 (1990)
5) Ishidate MJr. (Ed. ) Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998), pp.421-422 (1987)
6) Matsui S. et al., Water Sci. Technol., 21, 875-889 (1989)
7) US NTP (1989)
8) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Report Prepared for ATSDR under Contract No. 205-88-0608 by Life
   Systems,  Inc. USDHHS, PHS, ATSDR, Atrant, GA (1989)
9) US NTP, Tech. Rep., Series No 350 (1989)
10) Hayashi M et al., Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 26, 487-500 (1988)
11) Stocker KJ., et al. Mutagenesisi, 12, 169-173 (1997)

US-NTP Genotoxicity Screening:
› Ames Test : ’
› MLA Test : ›
› CA Test with CHO Cells:  
› SCE Test with CHO Cells:
’
› SLRL Test with Drosophila:›
› Reciprocal Translocation Test with Drosophila: @ 

œ ƒΏ-Bromo-iso-butyric acid (ƒΏ-ƒuƒƒ‚-iso-—Ž_j (2-Bromo-2-methylpropionic acid)
@@@
2052-01-9 @Industry@@ 167.01
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.75 mg/ml, -S9), 24h; D20= 0.99; TR= 39
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 1.2 mg/ml, -S9), 24h; D20= 0.94; › 2)
1) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test in vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)
2) Ministry of Labor, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) (1996) (Tables in English)

œ 1-(4'-Bromophenylazo) benzyl hydroperoxide i1-(4'-ƒuƒƒ‚ƒtƒFƒjƒ‰ƒ])ƒxƒ“ƒWƒ‹ƒqƒhƒƒp[ƒIƒLƒVƒhj
@@@
@72437-42-4 @Industry@@307.15
AM Sal/E.coli Min (?)
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 0.1 mg/ml, -S9), 48h
’
2)
1) Natl. Inst. Hygien Sci., Tokyo (?)
2) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)

œ 1-Bromopropane i1-ƒuƒƒ‚ƒvƒƒpƒ“j@(n-Propyl bromide)
@@@
106-94-5@@@@Industry@@122.99
AM Sal/E.coli Max ( 10 mg/palate, }S9)
 
1)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) Supp. 2 (2000) (Tables in English)

œ 2-Bromopropane
i2-ƒuƒƒ‚ƒvƒƒpƒ“j@(n-Propyl bromide)
@@
@75-26-3@@@Industry@@122.99
AM Sal/E.coli Min ( 78.1ƒΚg/plate, -S9); spa=212
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.6 mg/ml, -S9), 48h; D20=0.58 › 2)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) (1996) (Tables in English)
2) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) Supp. 2 (2000) (Tables in English)

œ ƒΏ-Bromopropionic acid iƒΏ-ƒuƒƒ‚ƒvƒƒsƒIƒ“Ž_j
@@@
598-72-8@@Industry@@ 152.98
AM Sal/E.coli Min ( 100ƒΚg/plate, +S9); spa=19.0 › 1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.4 mg/ml, -S9), 24h; D20=0.41 › 1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.3 mg/ml, -S9), 24h; D20=0.31; TR=65
›
2)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.) (1996)  (Tables in English)
2) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998)  (Tables in English)

œ 1-Bromo-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-2-iodoehtane (Gas) (IBTFE)
  421-70-5@@Industry@@ 306.82
AM Sal/E.coli Min ( 0.005 %, }S9)
›
1)
1) Ministry of Labour, Japan; Mutagen. Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst.; JETOC (Ed.), Suppl. 3, pp. 210 (2005)  (Tables in English)
     
œTop Page@iƒgƒbƒvƒy[ƒWj
œAbbreviation @iΘ—ͺ‹L†j@
œMutagenicity i•ΟˆΩŒ΄«j
œTest Systems@(ŽŽŒ±–@‚ΜŽν—ށj
œTechnical Problems@i‹Zp“I–β‘θ“_j
œList of@Compoundsi‰»‡•¨ƒŠƒXƒgj
œEvaluation of Results@iŽŽŒ±Œ‹‰Κ‚Μ•]‰Ώj