@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @
Group D-7 ‰»Šw\‘’@(Chemical Structure)  
œ Diethylene triamine iƒWƒGƒ`ƒŒƒ“ƒgƒŠƒAƒ~ƒ“j
@@@CASF 111-40-0@Industry/Solvent@MW: 103.17
AM Sal./E.coli Min ( 0.625 mg/plate, -S9); spa= 81.6 (E. coli)
›w
1)
1) Ministry of Labour, Jpan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., Suppl. 2 (2000) (Tables in English)
@
USA-NTP Genotoxicity ScreeningF

›@AmesTest F@ 
œ Diethylfumarateiƒtƒ}ƒ‹Ž_ƒWƒGƒ`ƒ‹j@
@@@623-91-6@@Industry @ 172.20
AM Sal./ E. coli Max( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.013@mg/ml, -‚r9), 24h; Poly also
›
1)
1) Ministry of Health & Welfare, Japan: Tox. Test. Rep. of Environ. Chem., Vol. 2, 125 (1995) (Tables in English)
œ Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate iƒW(2-ƒGƒ`ƒ‹ƒwƒLƒVƒ‹)ƒtƒ^ƒŒ[ƒgj(Dietyl phthalate; DEHP; DOP)
@@@ 117-81-7@@ Industry@@ 390.56
AM Sal./ E, coli Max ( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
AM Sal. Max ( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)   2-4)
AM E, coli Max ( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)   3)
CA CHL/IU Max (0.25@mg/ml, -‚r9), 24-48h
 
5)
CA Rat hepatocytes Max (?)   6)
CA CHO Max (?), }S9)   7)
SCE Don Max (10-3M)
 
8)
SCE Rat liver cell line Max (?)   6)
SCE CHO Max (?)   9)
UDS Rat hepatocytes Max (?)   10)
MLA L5178Y Min ( 0.02 mg/ml) › 1)
SM Ch, hepatocites Min ( 0.05 mg/ml) › 1)
MNv Mice (CD-1) Max ( 2 g/kg, ip)   9, 11)
DLv Mice Max ( 2.5 g/kg, or )   12)
SLRLv Drosophila Max (?)   13)
‚PjMinistry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.) (1996) (Tables in English)
2) Ashby J., et al., (eds) Rep. IPCS, Progress in Mutation Res., , Vol. 5, 752 (1985)
3) Yoshikawa K., et al., Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 21, 221-223 (1983)
4) Zeiger E., et al., Environ. Mutagen., 7, 213-232 (1986)
5) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)
6) Priston RAJ & Dean BJ,  Mutation Res., 5, 387-395 (1985)
7) Phillips et al., (1982)@(?)
8) Abe S & Sasaki M: J. Natl Cancer Inst., 58, 1635-1641 (1977)
9) Douglus RG, et al., Environ. Health Perspec., 65, 285-262 (1985)
10) Probst GS  & Hill LE, Prog. Mutation Res., 5, 387-395 (1985)
11) Morita T., et al: Mutation Res., 389, 3-122 (1997)
12) Hamano Y., et al., Osaka Pub. Health., Sanital Res. Cent., pp. 1-4 (1979)
13) Yoon JS., Environ Mutagen., 7, 349-367 (1985)

œ 1, 2-Diethylhydrazine-HCl
@@@ 7699-31-2@ Solvent@@@ 161.08
AM Sal. Max ( 10 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
‚PjMinistry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.) (1996) (in Japanese)
œ Diethyl ketone iƒWƒGƒ`ƒ‹ƒPƒgƒ“j
@@@ 96-22-0@ Solvent@@@ 86.13
YM Yeast ( Aneuploid, Recombination, Gene mutation) Max (?)
( Gene conversion) Max (?)
›
›
1)
2)
1) Zimmermann FK, et al,: Mutation Res., 149, 339-354 (1985)
2) Zimmermann FK, et al,: Mutation Res., 150, 203-210 (1985)

œ Diechyl malonate (ƒ}ƒƒ“Ž_ƒWƒGƒ`ƒ‹) (Malonic acid, diethylester; Diethyl propanedioate)
@@@ 105-53-3@ Industryt@@@ 160.17
AM Sal./E.coli Max ( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
‚PjMinistry of Labour, Japan: Japan Bioassay Res. Center, Ann. Rep. (2005) ;  Ministry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.), Suppl.4 (2008), p. 145 (Tables in English)
œ Diethylnitrosamine (DEN) iƒWƒGƒ`ƒ‹ƒjƒgƒƒTƒ~ƒ“j
@@@ 55-18-5@ Labouratory@@ 102.14
DNA E. coli (DNA Repair); Min (1 ƒΚg/well)
›
1)
AM Sal. Min ( 60 ƒΚM, +S9)
›
2)
Sal. Min ( 0.02nM, +S9) ›w 3)
SLRL Drosophila Min (?)
›
4)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 3.0 mg/ml, +S9), 3-21h
›
5,6)
CA CHO Min ( 100 mM, +S9)
›
7)
SCE CHO Min ( 4.0 mM, +S9)
›
7)
SCE Human LY Max ( 500 ƒΚM, -S9)
 
8)
CA V79/8AG Min ( 10 mM, +S9)
›
9)
UDS Rat/hepat. Min ( 10-3 M)
›
10)
CT BHK21c Min (?)
›
11)
MNv Rat/SD Min ( 40 mg/kg, ip)
›
12)
MNv Mice (NMRI) Max( 2 x 100 mg/kg, ip)   13)
SCEv CH Max ( 200 mg/kg, ip)
 
14)
1) Ichinotsubo D, et al,: Mutation Res., 46, 53-62 (1977)
2) Yahagi T, et al,: Mutation Res., 48, 121 (1977)
3) McCann J., et al: Proc. Nt. Acad. Sci., USA, 72, 5135 (1975)
4) Fahmy OG, et al, Mutation Res., 3, 201-217 (1966)
4) Vogel E: In Montesano R, et al, (Eds): Screening Tests in Chemical Carcinogenesis,@IARC Sci., Pub. No. 12, 00. 117-137 (1976)
5) Matsuoka A, et al,: Mutation Res.,66, 277-290 (1979)
6) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)
7) Natarajan AT, et al,: Mutation Res., 37, 83-90 (1976)
8) Craig-Holmes AP and Shaw MW: Mutation Res., 46-375-384 (1977)
9) Kuroki T, et al,: Cancer Res., 37, 1044-1050 (1977)
10) Williams GM & Laspia MF: Cancer Letter, 6, 199-206 (1979)
11) Styles JA: Br. J. Cance, 37, 931-936 (1978)
12) Trzos RJ, et al,: Mutation Res., 58, 79-86 (1978)
13) Wild D : Mutation Res., 56, 319-327 (1978)
13) Bayer U: Mutation Res., 56, 305-309 (1978)

œ N, N'-Diethyl-p-phenilenediamine iN, N'-ƒWƒGƒ`ƒ‹-p-ƒtƒFƒjƒŒƒ“ƒWƒAƒ~ƒ“j
@@@
93-05-0@ Industry @ 164.28
AM Sal./ E. coli Min (}S9) ?
›
1)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.0025@mg/ml, -‚r9), 24h; D20=0.009; TR=4800

2)
1) Zeiger E, et al,: Environ. Mol. Mutagen, 11 (Suppl 12), 1-158 (1988)
2) Sofuni T, et al,: Mutation Res., 241, 175-213 (1990)
œ O,O-Diethylphosphorochroridethioate
@@@ 2524-04-1@ Industry@ 188.61
AM Sal. Max ( 0.313 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
‚PjMinistry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.), Suppl. 2 (2000) (Tables in English)
œ Diethyl phthalate iƒtƒ^ƒ‹Ž_ƒWƒGƒ`ƒ‹GDEPj
@@@
84-66-2@ Industry@ 222.23
AM Sal./ E. coli Max (}S9) ?
 
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 0.25 mg/ml, -‚r9), 24-48h; (No data for +S9)
 
2, 3)
1) Yoshikawa K., et al., Fd Chem. Toxic., 21, 221-223 (1983)
2) Ishidate MJr. & Odashima S.: Mutation Res., 48, 337-354 (1977)
3) Sofuni T. (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)

US-NTP Genotoxicity ScreeningF
› AmesTestF  
› CA Test with CHO CellsF@
 @
› SCE Test with CHO CellsF@›

yNotez@(Cited from CICADs Documents,1, 1998))

    A comparison of the results of in vitro mutagenic assays of diethyl phthalate in various strains of Salmonella typhimurium shows contradictory findings. Diethyl phthalate has been shown to be mutagenic for S. typhimurium strains TA100 and TA1535 only without metabolic activation (Kozumbo et al., 1982; Agarwal et al., 1985). The maximum ratios of induced revertants to control were about 2?3 (Kozumbo et al., 1982; Agarwal et al., 1985) and about 2 (Agarwal et al., 1985) for TA100 and TA1535, respectively. No induced revertants were observed for TA98 and TA1537 with or without metabolic activation (Rubin et al., 1979; Agarwal et al., 1985).
    Contrary to positive findings, diethyl phthalate has been found to be non-mutagenic in S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 with or without metabolic activation (Zeiger et al., 1982, 1985; NTP, 1995).
   Two chromosomal aberration assays with Chinese hamster fibroblasts and ovaries, respectively, produced negative results for diethyl phthalate at concentrations up to 0.324 mg/ml (Ishidate & Odashima, 1977; NTP, 1995). However, at culture concentrations of 0.05, 0.167, and 0.5 ƒΚg/litre, diethyl phthalate produced a concentration-related increase in the number of relative sister chromatid exchanges per chromosome. This effect occurred only in the presence of the S9 fraction from rat liver homogenates (NTP, 1995).
   In summary, the results of in vitro mutagenicity tests in microbial assays are equivocal. No in vivo studies were located.

References
EAgarwal DK, Lawrence WH, Nunez LJ, Autian J (1985) Mutagenicity evaluation of phthalic acid esters and metabolites in Salmonellatyphimurium cultures. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 16(1): 61-69.
EIshidate M Jr, Odashima S (1977) Chromosome tests with 134 compounds on Chinese hamster cells in vitro: A screening for chemical carcinogens. Mutation Research, 48: 337-354.
EKozumbo WJ, Kroll R, Rubin RJ (1982) Assessment of the mutagenicity of phthalate esters. Environmental Health Perspectives, 45: 103-109. ;
ENTP (1995) NTP technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of diethylphthalate (CAS No. 84-66-2) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (dermal studies) with dermal initiation/promotion study of diethylphthalate and dimethylphthalate (CAS No. 131-11-3) in male Swiss (CD-1) mice. Research Triangle Park, NC, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Toxicology Program (NTP TR 429).

ERubin RJ, Kozumbo W, Kroll R (1979) Ames mutagenic assay of a series of phthalate esters: Positive response of dimethyl and diethyl esters. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 48: A133.
EZeiger E, Haworth E, Speck S, Mortelmans K (1982) Phthalate ester testing in the National Toxicology Programfs environmental mutagenesis test development program. Environmental Health Perspectives, 45:99?101.
EZeiger E, Haworth S, Mortelmans K, Speck W (1985) Mutagenicity testing of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and related chemicals in Salmonella. Environmental Mutagenesis, 7: 213-232.


œ Diethylstilbestrol (ƒWƒGƒ`ƒ‹ƒXƒ`ƒ‹ƒxƒXƒeƒ[ƒ‹j
@@ 56-53-1@Medicine@ 268.34
AM Sal. Max ( ?)
 
1-4)
YM S. cerevisiae (Aneuploid) Min (?)
›
5)
CA CH Poly Min (?)
›
6)
CA CHL/IU Min (0.0075 mg/ml, -S9), 48h ; PD20=0.0074 (Poly)
›
7,8)
CA Human LY Min (?)
›
9)
SCE Don Max ( ?)
 
10)
SCE Human LY Min (?)
›
11)
MLA L5178Y Min (?)
›
12)
MNv Mice/BM Max (?)
 
13)
CAv Mice/BM Min (?) (Negative for SCE)
›
14)
CT C3H/10T1/2 Max (?)(}S9)
 
15)
1) McCann J., et al. : Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. (USA), 72,@5135-5139 (1975)
2) Dunkel VC,: J. Assoc. off. Anal. Chem., 62, 874-882 (1979)
3) Anderson D & Styles JA: Br. J. Cancer, 37, 924-930 (1978)
4) Kawachi T, et al,: in: The Predictive Value of Short-Term Screening Tests in Carcinogenicity Evaluation,(Eds):
@@Williams GM et al., Appl. Methods Oncol., 3, 253-267 (1980)
5) Parry JM, et al,: Nature (London), 294, 263-265 (1981)
6) Sawada M & Ishidate MJr: Mutation Res., 57, 175-182 (1978)
7) Ishidate MJr, et al,: Jap. Cancer Res.(GANN), Monogr., 27, 95-108 (1981)
8)
Sofuni T, (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro, LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)
9) Dzangulashvili NA: Cytol. Genet. (USSR), 16(2), 28-33(1982)
10) Abe S & Sasaki M: J. Natl Cancer Inst., 58, 1635-1641 (1977)
11) Hill A & Wolff S: Cancer Res., 43, 4114-4118 (1982)
12) Clive D, et al,: Mutation Res., 59,-61-108 (1979)
13) Chrisman CL & Baumgartner, Mutation Res., 67, 157-160 (1979)
14) Ivett JL and Tice RR: Environ. Mutagen., 3, 445-452 (1981)
15) Lillehaug JR & Djurhuus R: Carcinogenesis, 3, 797-799 (1982)

yNotez (Cited from IARC Monograph, Suppl. 6, 1987)
@@No data were available on the genetic and related effects of DES.
@@DES induced CAs in bone-marrow cells of mice treated in vivo, but data on induction of SCE and MNs were equivocal; it induced SCEs in one study in hamsters with DES (Liehr, Avitts, Randerath, 5301, 1986). Aneuploidy was induced in human cells in vitro, but data on induction of SCEs, CA and mutation were inconclusive; it induced DNA strand breaks, but not UDS, except in a single study. Tests for transformation in rat and Syrian hamster embryo cells gave positive results, while results fro mouse cells were negative. Aneuploidy and DNA strand breaks were induced in rodent cell in vitro, but results for CAs, MNs and SCEs were equivocal; DES did not induce mutation or UDS, except in a single study in Syrian hamster embryo cells. It did not inhibit intercellular communication of Chinese hamster V78 cells. It induced aneuploidy in fungi, but , in most studies, it did not induce mutation, recombination or gene conversion. It did not induce mutation in a variety of bacterial and insect systems, but it was mutagenic in plants. DNA damage was not induced in fungi or bacteria. DES induced single-strand breaks in bacteriophage DNA in the presence of a horseradish peroxidase activation system.
œ Diethyl sulfate i—°Ž_ƒWƒGƒ`ƒ‹j
@@@ 64-67-5@Industry 154.19
AM Sal./ E. coli Min ( 0.313/plate, }S9); spa= 9640 (TA100)

1)
AM Sal.. Min (?) › 2)
CA CHL/IU Min ( 0.63 mg/ml, -‚r9), 24h ; D20= 0.28
›
1)
CA CHO Min (?) › 2)
SCE CHO Min (?) › 2)
MN Mamal. cells Min (?) › 2)
SM Mamal. cells Min (?) › 2)
UDS Hum. cells Min (?) › 2)
DLs Mice Min (?) › 2)
SLRLv Drosophila Min (?) › 2)
‚Pj Ministry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.) (1996) (Tables in English)
2) Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDH), US National Library of Medicine (1996)

œ Diflubenzuron @
iƒWƒtƒ‹ƒxƒ“ƒYƒƒ“j
@@@ 35367-38-5@Insecticide 310.7
REC B. subtilis Max ( 2.0 mg/disk)
 
1)
AM Sal./E. coli Max ( 5.0 mg/plate, }S9)
 
1)
CA CHO Max ( 0.25 mg/ml, }S9)
 
1)
MN Mice Max ( 1.5 g/kg x 2)
 
1)
‚Pj Agro Kane-Sho, Co. Ltd.: J. Pesticide Sci., 17, S159-S164 (1992) (in Japanese)

œ Difluoromethane
@@@@ 75-37-6@Industry@ 66.05
AM Sal./ E. coli Max ( 44%, }S9) ( in vapor)
 
1)
‚Pj Ministry of Labour, Japan: Mutagenicity Test Data of Exist. Chem. Subst., JETOC (Ed.) (1996) (Tables in English)
œ Diglycidyl ether@iƒWƒOƒŠƒVƒWƒ‹ƒG[ƒeƒ‹G DGEj
@@ 2238-07-5@Industry@ 130.14
AM Sal. Min (?)
›
1,2)
MB Bact. phages Min (?)
›
1,2)
MB N. crassa
(ƒAƒJƒpƒ“ƒJ)@
Min (?)
›
1,2)
CA Vicia faba;
(ƒ\ƒ‰ƒ}ƒ)
Min (?)
›
1,2)
‚PjHine CH., et al.: Patty's Industrail Hygiene and Toxicology, 3rd Rev. Ed., Bol. 2A, Toxicology, pp. 2204-2208, Clayton GD. & Clayton FE (Eds.), John Wiley & Sons, New York (1981)
2) Berufsgenossenschaft der Chemischen Industrie: Toxicological Evaluations No. 66. BG Chemie,@Heidelberg, FRG (Sept., 1989)

œ Diheptyl phthalate @iƒtƒ^ƒ‹Ž_ƒWƒwƒvƒ`ƒ‹ƒGƒXƒeƒ‹j
@@@@ 3648-21-3 @Industry@@ 362.51
AM Sal./ E. coli Max ( 5.0 mg/plate,}S9)
 
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 5.0 mg/ml, -‚r9), 6-18h; (No data for +S9)
 
1)
CA CHL/IU Max ( 4.0 mg/ml, }‚r9), 6-18h;
 
2)
1) Ministry of Health, Labour & Welfare, Japan (Ed): Toxicity Testing Reports of Environ. Chemicals, Vol. 4 (1996) (Tables in  English)
2) Sofuni T, (Ed.): Data Book of Chromosomal Aberration Test In Vitro LIC, Tokyo (1998) (Tables in English)
œTop Page@iƒgƒbƒvƒy[ƒWj
œAbbreviation @iΘ—ͺ‹L†j@
œMutagenicity i•ΟˆΩŒ΄«j
œTest Systems@(ŽŽŒ±–@‚ΜŽν—ށj
œTechnical Problems@i‹Zp“I–β‘θ“_j
œList of@Compoundsi‰»‡•¨ƒŠƒXƒgj
œEvaluation of Results@iŽŽŒ±Œ‹‰Κ‚Μ•]‰Ώj